Bayesian Inference for Questionable Data

Authors

  • Klaus Felsenstein Department of Statistics and Probability Theory Vienna University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v31i2&3.476

Abstract

In this paper we develop Bayesian procedures for vague data. The data are assumed to be vague in the sense that the likelihood is a mixture of the model distribution and an error distribution. In this case the standard updating procedure of the model prior would fail.


As a new method to deal with such imprecise data we consider observable uncertainties. In this model a specified degree of belief for the validity of the observation is added to the original measurement. Our proposal involves the idea that occasionally the observations are caused by an unknown error distribution. We discuss the effect of this assumption and show a parametrical and non-parametrical analysis in this setup.


For the analysis of the error distribution we establish a nonparametrical approach.
Convex optimization procedures can be applied for a nonparametric estimation of the error distribution. An equivalence theorem characterizes optimal estimates and provides an iterative procedure converging to the empirical Bayes estimate.

References

C. Antoniak. Mixture of dirichlet processes with applications to Bayesian nonparametric problems. Ann. Statist., 2:1152–1174, 1974.

M. Bayarri and J. Berger. Robust Bayesian analysis of selection models. Ann. Statist., 25: 645–659, 1998.

M. Bayarri and M. DeGroot. Bayesian analysis of selection models. The Statistician, 36: 137–146, 1987.

J. Berger. An overview of Bayesian robustness. Test, 3:1–125, 1994.

J. Berger and L. Berliner. Robust Bayes and empirical Bayes analysis with epsiloncontaminated priors. Ann. Statist., 14:461–486, 1986.

J. Berger, B. Betro, E. Moreno, L. Pericchi, F. Ruggeri, G. Salinetti, and L. Wasserman (Eds.). Bayesian Robustness, volume 29 of IMS Lecture Notes. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996.

M. DeGroot. A Bayesian view of assessing uncertainty and comparing expert opinion. J. Statist. Planning and Inf., 20:295–306, 1988.

K. Felsenstein. Bayes’sche Statistik für kontrollierte Experimente. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, 1996.

P. Gustafson and L. Wasserman. Local sensitivity diagnostics for Bayesian inference. Ann. Statist., 23:2153–2167, 1995.

M. Lavine, L. Wasserman, and R. Wolpert. Linearization of Bayesian robustness problems. J. Statist. Planning and Inf., 37:307–316, 1993.

B. Lindsay. Mixture Models: Theory, Geometry and Applications. NFS-CBMS Regional Conference Series. IMS, Hayward, 1995.

C. Molzer, K. Felsenstein, R. Viertl, J. Litzka, and A. Vycudil. Statistische Methoden zur Auswertung von Straßenzustandsdaten, volume 499 of Straßenforschung. BM für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie, Wien, 2000.

R. Rockafellar. Convex Analysis. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1972.

F. Ruggeri and L. Wasserman. Infinitesimal sensitivity of posterior distributions. Canad. J. Statist., 21:195–203, 1993.

R. Tibshirani and L. Wasserman. Some aspects of the reparameterization of statistical models. Canad. J. Statist., 22:163–173, 1994.

P. Whittle. Optimization under Constraints. Wiley, London, 1971.

P. Whittle. Some general points in the theory of optimal experimental design. J. Royal Statist. Soc. B, 35:123–130, 1973.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Bayesian Inference for Questionable Data. (2016). Austrian Journal of Statistics, 31(2&3), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v31i2&3.476