Finite-Sample Properties of the GLS-Based Dickey-Fuller Test in the Presence of Breaks in Innovation Variance

Authors

  • Steven Cook University of Wales Swansea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v33i3.444

Abstract

Using local-to-unity detrending, the GLS-based Dickey-Fuller test has been shown to possess higher power than other available unit root tests. As a result, application of this easily implemented test has increased in recent years. In the present study the finite-sample size and power of the GLS-based Dickey-Fuller test is examined in the presence of breaks in innovation variance under the null. In contrast to the original Dickey-Fuller test which has been shown to suffer severe distortion in such circumstances, the GLS-based
test latter exhibits robustness to all but the most extreme breaks in variance.
The results derived show the GLS-based test to be more robust to variance breaks than other modified Dickey-Fuller tests previously considered in the literature.

References

Aggarwal, R., Inclan, C., and Leal, R. (1999). Volatility in emerging stock markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 34, 33-55.

Burridge, P., and Taylor, A. (2000). On the power of GLS-type unit root tests. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 62, 633-645.

Cook, S. (2002). Unit root testing in the presence of innovation variance breaks: A simple solution with increased power. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 5, 233-240.

Cook, S. (2003). Size and power properties of powerful unit root tests in the presence of variance breaks. Physica A, 317, 432-448.

Dickey, D., and Fuller, W. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431.

Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T., and Stock, J. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64, 813-836.

Fuller, W. (1996). Introduction to statistical time series (second ed.). New York: Wiley.

Inclan, C., and Tiao, G. (1994). Use of cumulative sums of squares for retrospective detection of changes of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 913-923.

Kim, T.-H., Leybourne, S., and Newbold, P. (2002). Unit root tests with a break in variance. Journal of Econometrics, 109, 365-387.

Leybourne, S. (1995). Testing for unit roots using forward and reverse Dickey-Fuller regressions. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 57, 559-571.

Ng, S., and Perron, P. (2001). Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica, 69, 1519-1554.

Park, H., and Fuller, W. (1995). Alternative estimators and unit root tests for the autoregressive process. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 16, 415-429.

Shaman, P., and Stine, R. (1988). The bias of autoregressive coefficient estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 842-848.

Shin, D., and So, B. (2001). Recursive mean adjustment for unit root tests. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 22, 595-612.

Tanaka, K. (1984). An asymptotic expansion associated with maximum likelihood estimators in ARMA models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 46, 58-67.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-03

How to Cite

Cook, S. (2016). Finite-Sample Properties of the GLS-Based Dickey-Fuller Test in the Presence of Breaks in Innovation Variance. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 33(3), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v33i3.444

Issue

Section

Articles