The Development of an Integrated and Systematized Information System for Economic and Policy Impact Analysis

Authors

  • Filippo Oropallo ISTAT (Italian Statistical Institute), Rom
  • Francesca Inglese ISTAT (Italian Statistical Institute), Rom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v33i1&2.439

Abstract

The paper addresses the integration problems that have been faced in reconciling administrative and survey sources and combining them into one multi-source database. It shows the architecture of the integration process that has been adopted and the exploitation of the integrated database for economic and policy impact analysis at a micro level. The integration of administrative and survey data is performed by exact matching when the same unit is identified otherwise it is performed by statistical matching
techniques. To apply these techniques, matching variables are required: one quite apparent option is to use firm characteristics as provided by the business register. The development of the Enterprise Integrated and Systematized Information System (EISIS) opens new possibility in microsimulation analysis to study the tax burden and the economic performance of enterprises through the construction of micro-founded indicators. IT (Information Technology) features of the whole process are also described that are the formalization of the integration process and the structure of the user friendly interface of the integration software. Confidentiality is satisfied by remote processing on a protected server that is only accessible to granted users of the National Statistical Institute.

References

C. Abbate. Completeness of Information and Imputation from Donor with Minimum Mixed Distance, Quaderni di Ricerca ISTAT, n. 4/1997, pp. 68-102. 1997

R.F. Bardazzi, M.G. Pazienza, V. Parisi. The Effects of the Italian Tax Reform on Corporations: a Microsimulation Approach.http://www.istat.it/diecofis. 2003

J. Black. Changes in Sampling Units in Surveys of Businesses. In: 2001 FCSM Research Conference Papers, US Census Bureau. 2001

J.M. Brick and G. Kalton. Handling Missing Data in Survey Research, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, vol. 5, pp. 215-238. 1996.

G. Brackstone. Managing Data Quality in a Statistical Agency, Survey Methodology, December 1999, vol. 25, pp. 139-149. 1999.

M. Denk and F. Oropallo. Overview of the Issues in Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Multi-Source Databases. http://www.istat.it/diecofis/deliverable_list.htm. 2002.

M. Denk, F. Inglese and M.G. Calza. Assessment of different approaches for the integration of ample surveys, http://www.istat.it/diecofis/deliverable_list.htm. 2003

J.C. Deville and C.E. Särndal C. E. Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 87, pp. 376-382. 1992.

EC-JRC, ISTAT - Software analysis - Development of methodologies and of a software for the measurement of statistical quality, and for comparing the robustness of

alternative multi-source, integrated databases - DIECOFIS http://www.istat.it/diecofis/deliverable_list.htm. 2003.

Eurostat. Use of Administrative Sources for Business Statistic Purposes: Handbook on Good Practices – Theme 4 (Industry, Trade and Services), Eurostat Edition. 1999.

Eurostat. Model quality report in business statistics, Eurostat Working Group “Assessment of quality in business statistics”. 1999.

P.D. Falorsi and S. Falorsi. Un metodo di stima generalizzato per le indagini sulle famiglie e sulle imprese (A Generalized Estimation Method for Surveys of Families and Firms). Quaderni CON PRI, University of Bologna. 1995.

FCSM – Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology. Report on Exact and Statistical Matching Techniques, Statistical Policy Working Paper 5, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. 1980.

E. Giovannini and A. Sorce. Integration of Statistical (survey) data with registers (administrative) data. Paper contributed to the Meeting on the Management of Statistical Information Technology. 2001.

W.H. Inmon. – Data Marts and Data Warehouse: Information Architecture for the Millenium – Informix Corporation.

ISTAT. L’innovazione tecnologica nelle imprese (Firms’ Technological Innovation) – Note Rapide – July 1999 (LE Survey). http://www.istat.it/Imprese/Ricerca-e-/index.htm.

ISTAT. I risultati economici delle medio-grandi imprese Anni 1998-99 (Economic Outcomes of Medium-Large Size Enterprises) - Statistiche in breve - July 2000 (LE Survey) - http://www.istat.it/Imprese/Struttura-/index.htm. 2000.

ISTAT. Indagine Prodcom (prodcom Survey) – Indagine sulla struttura dei Costi (Cost structure Survey) http://www.istat.it/Imprese-e-/index.htm. 2001a.

ISTAT. Struttura e competitività del sistema delle imprese industriali e dei servizi nel 1998 (Structure and competitiveness of industrial and service enterprise system in 1998). - Statistiche in breve - Luglio 2001 (LE & PMI Survey)

http://www.istat.it/Imprese/Struttura-/index.htm. 2001b.

ISTAT. Indagine sul Commercio Estero (Foreign Trade Survey). Current version available at http://www.coeweb.istat.it/. 2002a.

ISTAT. L’uso delle tecnologie dell’informazione e della comunicazione nelle imprese (The use of ICT in Italian firms) – Statistiche in breve http://www.istat.it/Imprese/Ricerca-e-/index.htm. 2002b.

ISTAT. CONCORD v1.0 - (Generalized Data Editing Software) SOFTWARE GENERALIZZATO PER IL CONTROLLO E LA CORREZIONE DEI DATI RILEVATI NELLE INDAGINI STATISTICHE – MPS – ISTAT 2002 - http://www.istat.it/Metodologi/index.htm. 2002c.

ISTAT. GENESEES v1.0 - (GENEralised software for Sampling Estimates and Errors in Surveys) SOFTWARE PER IL CALCOLO DELLE STIME E DEGLI ERRORI CAMPIONARI– MPS – ISTAT 2002 - http://www.istat.it/Metodologi/ index.htm. 2002d.

T.B. Jabine and F.J. Scheuren. Record Linkages for Statistical Purposes: Methodological Issues. Journal of Official Statistics 2 (3), 255-277. 1986.

J.B. Kadane. Some Statistical Problems in Merging Data Files. In: 1978 Compendium of Tax Research, US Dept. of the Treasury, 159–171. Reprinted in Journal of Official Statistics 17 (3), 423–433. 1978.

G. Kalton and D. Kasprzik. The treatment of missing survey data, Survey Methodology, vol. 12, n. 1, pp. 1-16. 1986

G. Kalton and D. Kasprzik. Imputing for missing survey responses, Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association. 1982.

W.A. Kamakura and M. Wedel. Statistical Data Fusion for Cross-Tabulation, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 34, pp. 485-498. 1997.

J.G. Kovar and P.J. Whitridge. Imputation of Business Survey Data. In: Cox et al. (eds.), Business Survey Methods, New York: J. Wiley. 1995.

H.J. Lenz. Multi-Data Sources and Data Fusion. In: Proc. New Techniques and Technologies for Statistics (NTTS) 1998, EUROSTAT, 139–146. 1998.

R.J.A. Little and D.B. Rubin. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, Wiley & Sons, New York . 1987.

F.M. Malvestuto. Data Integration in Statistical Databases. In: Michalewicz (ed.), Statistical and Scientific Databases, Chichester: Ellis Horwood, 201–232. 1991.

F. Oropallo and D. Skalbania. Concept of IT framework issues and development of software for the creation of a multi-source data base http://www.istat.it/diecofis/deliverable_list.htm. 2003.

G. Paass. Statistical Record Linkage Methodology: State of the Art and Future Prospects. In: Proc. International Statistical Institute, 45th Session, Amsterdam. 1985.

G. Paass. Statistical match: Evaluation of existing procedures and improvements by using additional information. G.H. Orcutt and H. Quinke (eds). Microanalytic Simulation Models to Support Social and Financial Policy. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 401-422. 1986.

P. Roberti, F. Oropallo, F. Inglese, L. Lo Cascio and G. de Martinis G. Towards a Systemic Analysis of Italian Industrial Texture Review, Industria 4/2002, Il Mulino. 2003.

R.H. Renssen. Use of Statistical Matching Techniques in Calibration Estimation, Survey Methodology, vol. 24, n. 2, pp. 171-183.1998.

W.L. Rodgers. An Evaluation of Statistical Matching. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2, 91-102. 1984.

D.B. Rubin. Multiple Imputation for Non-response in Surveys, Wiley & Sons, New York. 1987.

N. Ruggles and R. Ruggles. A Strategy for Merging and Matching Microdata Sets. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 3 (2), 353–372. 1974.

F. Scheuren and W.E. Winkler. Regression Analysis of Data Files that are Computer Matched II. Survey Methodology 23, 157–165. 1997.

J.L. Schafer and M.K. Olsen. Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: a data analyst's perspective, Multivariate Behavioural Research, vol. 33, pp. 545-571. 1998.

A.C. Singh, C.A. Mohl. Understanding Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling”, Survey Methodology, vol. 22, n.2, pp. 107-115. 1996.

A.C. Singh, H.J. Mantel, M.D. Kinack and G. Rowe. Statistical Matching: Use of Auxiliary Information as an Alternative to the Conditional Independence Assumption, Survey Methodology, June 1993- vol. 19, No.1 pp. 59-79 - Statistics Canada. 1993.

W.E. Winkler. Matching and Record Linkage. In B. G. Cox et al. (ed.), Business Survey Methods, Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 920-935 (355-384). 1995.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-03

How to Cite

Oropallo, F., & Inglese, F. (2016). The Development of an Integrated and Systematized Information System for Economic and Policy Impact Analysis. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 33(1&2), 211–235. https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v33i1&2.439

Issue

Section

Articles